The Blog will go on...
...hopefully...probably.
I didn't want the Harris piece to be my last post in the US this year. Soo...here's an annoucement for Blog Day. Cool.
...hopefully...probably.
I didn't want the Harris piece to be my last post in the US this year. Soo...here's an annoucement for Blog Day. Cool.
As I scramble to finish packing, tie up loose ends, and ignore the occasional butterfly flapping around in my belly; I take a moment to cringe at the woman's ..umm..what's the word...yuckiness?
Recently, she told a religious journal "that separation of church and state is "a lie" and God and the nation's founding fathers did not intend the country be "a nation of secular laws." Oh really.
According to Harris, the separation of church and state is "wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers." (Link)
She goes on to add "that if Christians are not elected, politicians will "legislate sin," including abortion and gay marriage." (Link)
Thankfully, we still live in a country where we do not endorse any missions to eradicate sin in the US senate.
I woke up this morning and had the following, disconcertingly lucid thought--Two more days. It had a vaguely ominous ring. These are my dreams from last night--heavily censored, but the meat of it still intact.
I tend to dream in small, episodic increments (hence the list)--sometimes related, more often not.
It's the night's kaleidscope bending the broken, colored pieces of my life into her own floral, dreamy orderliness.
Before the Bush reign, I had always assumed that when as Americans, we find ourselves swindled out of our civil liberties, there would be a national uproar. After all Clinton almost got impeached for bad judgements made that affected none of us. Surely when our basic tenets of democracy & freedom are stifled, the stakes will be higher--the accounts more exacting, more demanding.
Such naivety.
How did Bush manage to do what he has done? Among other things, how did he manage to detain an American citizen for over three years before the courts decided to grow some fallopian tubes and force him to charge the man with a crime? Theories and punditry abound, and I don't plan to add to the clamour here. But in the wake of the UK terrorist plots, I've been noting the hysterics of our airport security. And for what?
Remember it was the "plot to commit murder on an unimaginable scale"? No more pepsi, toothpaste nor--horrors--laptops or i-pods aboard aircrafts. They could be fashioned into bombs, we were told. And most of us agreed. Reasonable request. Minor inconvenience.
After all, the UK intelligence swooped down and nabbed these baddies right at the nick of time. I imagine terrorists snarling their way through the London airport with a little bit of puppy blood staining their fangs as they proceed to "commit murder on an unimaginable scale". Unimaginable, they said.
Then I read this report by Craig Murray that's been making the rounds in the blogosphere. None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports.
Then I heard this NPR report on the plausibility of making a bomb out of liquids.
Truth is like contact lenses you drop on the bathroom floor. It leaves you blind and groping, hoping to catch a glint of light across that concave glass.
It is not simply that such information is largely absent from the public discourse, which is irksome and disconcerting. But that this information is largely ignored altogether when piecing together national security. Policy considerations are reduced to ideological and reactionary fervor, appealing to the least thoughtful amongst us.
Last week, House Homeland Security Chairman Peter King endorsed requiring people of "Middle Eastern and South Asian" descent to undergo additional security checks because of their ethnicity and religion. more
This came shortly after, Fox News queried whether "It's time to have a Muslims check point line in American airports and have Muslims be scrutinized." more (via Sepia Mutiny)
Check out all the work our security authorities have been busy with lately:
Didn't Aesop warn us about crying wolf? Security is heightened to that fever pitch that comes with misguided ideology, fear and paranoia. I'm flying next week, and I am more concerned about tightly-wound security officials than I am of any terrorists. Remember those movies where a governmental big-shot looms protectively over his brethen and say, "We cannot let this get out! It will cause a public panic!" Now the government thinks up ways to ensure we don't feel too safe, too comfortable.
After an obnoxious (yet completely familiar) conversation with a fellow Iowan, I started furiously planning out a biting blog on cultural idiocy. Perhaps a "10 things I hate about living in the US" list. Inspired in part by Andy's one year anniversary blog post. By the way, sidenote: Congratulations Andy!
But by the time I settled in front of my laptop, I could no longer remember why I had my knickers up in knots in the first place. And I couldn't think of ten things that didn't sound uncomfortably close to whining. So it got scrapped.
But I have noticed that over the years, I am increasingly intolerant of questions that end in "is that a cultural thing?" or any mention of "dots on my forehead". Or even an innocuous, well-meaning compliment on the "costume" I am wearing.
Go google it. I am not your anthropology subject, fool.
Also isn't it obvious by now that I don' t know Gopal from Maryland or Shashi from New York? That your real estate agent is Indian means nothing--absolutely nothing--to me (except a cue for awkward head nod and smile). Watch more television! These queries are punchlines to a hundred sitcom jokes. For the love of the goddess, no I do not know Swathi from Detroit or Imran from Virginia..oh wait..I do know them...umm..nevermind...*slaps forehead*
Also yeah, I have an accent. Get over it. Please. As quickly as possible.
Ah, and here I was thinking I had successfully side-stepped a rant. No such luck. A rant cometh and spews forth like some shaken up coca cola can, spraying its sugary browness all over my little cyber nook.
The New York Times recently reported on Africa's increasing trendiness among celebrities. Behold Gwyneth's new Ad Campaign to help African children.
And much as it may strain the limits of good taste to say it, Africa — rife with disease, famine, poverty and civil war — is suddenly “hot.”
Beginning early in the decade with a trickle of celebrity fact-finding missions to strife-torn sub-Saharan nations (Bono in Ghana, Bono everywhere) that became a torrent within the last couple of years (Clay Aiken in Uganda, Jessica Simpson in Kenya), Africa has now been embraced by the masses...more
Irritating? Yes.
Thankfully others are being sarcastic and mocking, so we can all stop grinding our teeth.
According to a survey of over 2,000 adults..., books play a crucial role in influencing our opinions of strangers. Half of those asked admitted that they would look again or smile at someone on the basis of what they were reading.(Via this great post from Roswitha)
Not only does sitting with your nose in a book positively influence others' opinion of you, it could actually - get this - lead to sex. A third of those surveyed said that they "would consider flirting with someone based on their choice of literature". It's finally official, people. Reading is hot...more
When she's not replacing the cracked mirrored tiles on her disco crucifix, Madonna is trying to make a political statement about something, anything, that's more controversial than she's trying so hard to be. This week it's the Hezbollah-Israeli conflict...moreand then this..
Interpretation: Madonna is the one, disco-y bridge between these two warring factions. She is the only person who can bring them together in peace (also dance)...moreGo read. It's funny.
This is somewhat typical, if overly fawning, of the reviews for this National Book Award finalist—Joan Silber for her collection of short stories, Ideas of Heaven: A Ring of Stories. But I had a slightly different take...*yawn*